Tea Party
members of the House are getting a lot of attention recently, largely because,
despite their small numbers and waning influence, they continue to out maneuver
House Speaker John Boehner. But do not
let their capacity to create a spectacle confuse anyone into thinking that
their irrational approach to governance is a widely shared view on Capital Hill
or among average Americans.
No one disputes the need to live within our means. The
challenge is how to get there and it is beyond irrational, in addition to being
undemocratic and unpatriotic, to insist on a 'my way or the highway' approach.
That is just not the way we move forward, not the way decisions are made, and
can only result in what we have been observing, paralysis. An approach to
governance premised on the desire to eliminate government is irrational and it
seems that is the conclusion many Americans have come to in data from the
November election to today.
Conservative
pollsters at Rasmussen reported Monday that only 8% of Americans report being
members of the Tea Party (down from a high of 24% in April of 2010, immediately
following passage of the Affordable Care Act).
Perhaps more revealing, only 30% of likely voters in America have a positive
view of the Tea Party, while 49% have a negative view.
These polls
results match results from the 2012 election, potentially indicating a sustainable
trend in public opinion. This past
November we saw two of the most extreme Tea Party voice in the House defeated
(Allan West of Florida and Joe Walsh of Illinois), the two ‘legitimate rape’
candidates both lost in the Senate (Todd Akin of Missouri and Richard Mourdock
of Indiana), and of the sixteen candidates endorsed by the Tea Party for the
Senate only four were successful.
With President
Obama’s approval rating at 53% (if you have not heard the song ‘no one as Irish
as Barak O’Bama’ check it out), the Tea Party leadership insists that the lesson
to be learned from the election is that they were not irrational enough. Karl Rove’s American Crossroads PAC got a 1%
return on investment for over $100 million in attack ads and its sister PAC,
Crossroads GPS, a 13% return on a similar amount of spending, according to
analysis done by the Sunlight Foundation.
No comments:
Post a Comment