It appears news media have decided to no longer use the keyword ‘Steubenville Rape Case’ to describe this crime.
The Steubenville rape case remains a story as the two football players, from a town that treats their players like untouchable superheroes, are about to be classified as sex offenders. One player is serving a one year and the other a two year sentence for raping a female classmate at a high school party. A grand jury has been convened to determine if others, like their football coach or football parents hosting parties, might also be culpable.
Social media helped expand the scope of this conflict, likely accounting, at least in part, for the convictions and (almost certainly) for the grand jury. It is no secret that community elites frequently protect local athletes, and that this status not infrequently results in the athletes taking advantage and behaving as if the law cannot touch them. Sometimes this means they are mere bullies; other times they become much worse, monsters criminally terrorizing fellow teens.
The hacker who used social media to prevent a small town elite from protecting high school rapists because they were on the football team had his house raided by twelve FBI agents with M-16 assault rifles and full riot gear. The hacker thinks that the FBI raid was sparked by local elites in Steubenville, because they wanted to send a message about speaking out.
COLUMBUS: Two Ohio high school football players convicted of raping a 16-year-old girl last year will be classified as sex offenders at a hearing next week.
The June 14 hearing by Judge Thomas Lipps at Jefferson County Juvenile Court in eastern Ohio is a possible first step for the two teens to be transferred from a state juvenile detention center to a facility that works with sex offenders.
Lipps must place the teens in one of three sex offender levels, with the strictest requiring reporting every three months for life and the most lenient requiring annual reporting for 10 years. Unlike adult sex offenders, however, the teens’ names won’t be included on publicly accessible websites. And the teens can request to be removed later based on their history of rehabilitation.
Lipps sentenced Trent Mays, 17, and Ma’lik Richmond, 16, to time in the juvenile detention system in March. He convicted them of raping the West Virginia girl after an August party celebrating a successful football team scrimmage. Richmond was sentenced to at least one year for raping the girl, while Mays was sentenced to at least two for raping her and taking a picture of the underage girl naked.
The case received international attention because of the role of texting and social media in exposing the attack. A grand jury is considering whether other people broke the law in connection with the case by not alerting authorities to initial reports of the rape.
At the time of their conviction and sentencing in March, Lipps recommended the boys be assigned to a facility in Chillicothe that he said has a strong program for treating juvenile sex offenders, Lighthouse Youth Center-Paint Creek.
The privately operated center is an open campus where staff members rely on their relationship with residents to prevent escapes, according to the Department of Youth Services.
Staff and children live together at the facility, which has shown success in keeping teens treated there from committing new crimes.
Both Paint Creek and state officials conduct face-to-face meetings with young people and review their records in state facilities whenever determining placement, said Youth Services spokeswoman Kim Parsell, adding that all state juvenile facilities “are able to meet the unique needs of youth.” She declined to comment specifically on the hearing or Mays and Richmond’s case.
Mays welcomed the chance for the transfer, his lawyer said.
“Our client looks forward to the opportunity to attend the Paint Creek program, follow all the facility rules, and display to the court and the community that he has been rehabilitated fully in hopes of returning to his family,” Columbus attorney Brian Duncan said in a statement. Messages were left for Richmond’s attorney.
No comments:
Post a Comment