Does Anything
Unite Democrats?
It seems that
even suffering through the daily ignorance and bigotry and disastrous policy of
a Trump presidency is still not enough to unite Democrats.
I voted for
Hillary Clinton in the primary and general election because, as President Obama
put it, no one has ever been more prepared to serve as our president. At the
same time, I wish my preferred candidate had not written a book about the 2016
election.
Re-hashing that defeat, in my
view (and mine is just one perspective) is likely to make it more difficult to
bring Democrats together. I will likely read the book, but I think publishing
it now is, as Doyle McManus puts it, “a gift to Trump and his conservative
allies.”
“It would be
one thing if Clinton’s book delivered new insights about what went wrong. But
it doesn’t. Every one of her explanations has been hashed out already.
Here’s the pity: She could have
written a different book — a book that briskly summarized the lessons of her
loss and suggested a path forward for the causes she loves. It wouldn’t have
been a bestseller, but it might have been more useful. Needless to say, the
relatively brief, forward-looking part of Clinton’s message has been swamped in
media coverage by all the juicy score-settling.”
It is possible that other Hillary
supporters will read this as a betrayal. It is also possible that my friends
who supported Bernie will misread this as me seeing the light and finally
recognizing that HRC is the problem. Neither captures my message. My message to
try to be the change.
In this case, to criticize my own
‘side’ when we behave in ways that make it likely we will fail to regain the
House in the midterms. We need to give up all hope of a better past and move on
from the 2016 election.
Continuing to rehash that painful
intramural squabbling will extend the 2016 legacy of defeat. We all need to
step back and focus our fury on the opponent who denies climate change and
reserve our intramural critiques for finding ways for our own ‘side’ within the
party to contribute to strengthening party unity.
So, even though it does not fit
into the ‘war’ metaphor—my position is that I think my side is making a mistake
here. My position rejects the either/or, sucker’s choice, framing of ‘you are
either with us or against us,’ either with Bernie or with Hillary. Yes, I am
criticizing HRC but not to side with Bernie against HRC, rather to make coming
together more likely.
She doesn't spare herself, or anyone else, from blame.
LATIMES.COM
She needed to write the book, but we don't have to read it
now or let it dominate every news cycle. We did and still do not need to get
distracted by every titillating Trump tweet or outburst- that got him elected.
I believe this is another opportunity to decide as a society which conversation
we want to be having, not to decide who can speak and who cannot.
Fair point. We certainly need to
combat the daily distraction that is Trumpisms bait n switch while real policy
damage continues unseen. And it is true that we could individually choose to
ignore this book. But it is hard to imagine a scenario when a person of this
stature writes a book about an important moment in our recent history and the
media ignores it. The key agent here is HRC: she knew the book would dominate
the news cycle (and eventually Republican attack ads) and she wrote this book
anyway, rather than a blueprint for how to bring us together to win the
midterms and writing this book later.
It occurs to me while reading this that she may have fallen
into the trap where women feel they need to explain themselves. We do not.
Whatever course this woman takes, she will be criticized for. She's damned if
she does and damned if she doesn't.
Also a fair point. HRC carries
baggage like none in history. The far-right has spent billions on a 20 year
campaign to smear her and it clearly had a huge impact on the election. And even
without this very specific baggage, she was treated differently in ways that
impacted the outcome, just because she is a woman. I want to hear her voice;
just want to her to help us move forward.
We will lose the midterms because of gerrymandering more
than anything else but we will think it's because of our message or infighting
or Clinton or whatever.
Gerrymandering is just the outcome
of decades of political activity on the right at the state level—an arena where
Democrats have been soundly defeated and could be seen as MIA, which is one of
many mistakes (under the leadership of the Clinton wing) to correct moving
forward. For now, it is the rule of the game and we have to succeed within that
framework.
Agree - she could have written a suggested path for the
Democratic Party and democracy... and it could have opened new doors instead of
rehashing old news cycles...
No comments:
Post a Comment