Self Pocket Picking
Charles
Blow in the New York Times helps
us again as we try to make sense of the mess we have gotten ourselves into….
Describing a
recently televised one-hour policy meeting on immigration where the president
demonstrated his lack of skill, Blow concludes that the meeting paints a
picture of…
“a man who had absolutely no idea what he was talking about; a man who says things that are 180 degrees from the things he has said before; a man who has no clear line of reasoning; a man who is clearly out of his depth and willing to do and say anything to please the people in front of him.
He demonstrated once again that he is a man without principle, interested only in how good he can make himself look and how much money he can make.”
Blow notes that (to the degree possible) if we guess at what
policy might emerge from the meeting and the president does what he seemed to
say he would do, the president would betray his base yet again. He will
demonstrate that he is willing to say “anything
to keep them angry,” including lying to his base, and “once again, they
won’t care.”
“That is
because…Trumpism is a religion founded on patriarchy and white supremacy.
It is the
belief that even the least qualified man is a better choice than the most
qualified woman and a belief that the most vile, anti-intellectual,
scandal-plagued simpleton of a white man is sufficient to follow in the
presidential footsteps of the best educated, most eloquent, most affable black
man."
Blow reminds
us that this is not new, quoting President Johnson to describe what has been
called the ‘Southern Strategy’ of pitting white workers against black workers
so their division and distraction frees up non-workers to take advantage of
both, riding a wave of white working class support to electoral victory.
“As President Lyndon B. Johnson said in the 1960s to a young Bill Moyers: ‘If you can
convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t
notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and
he’ll empty his pockets for you.’”
Anger does seem to be a common
denominator among Trump supporters. A deep seated anger easily redirected into
hatred and violence, but an anger also based on this pocket-picking that has
steadily diminished their quality of life. Rather than see the plutocrat pocket
pickers as the enemy, however, this anger is satisfied with racial
self-righteousness.
“…Donald Trump represents white
people’s right to be wrong and still be right.”
Frustration as declining
control over our own lives fuels an expressive response designed by pocket
pickers to empower pocket pickers, instead of fueling an effective
counter-mobilization (by design). And we all suffer as a result, though some of
us suffer a lot more.
“For white
supremacy to be made perfect, the lowest white man must be exalted above those
who are black.
No matter how much of an
embarrassment and a failure Trump proves to be, his exploits must be judged a
success. He must be deemed a correction to Barack Obama and a superior choice
to Hillary Clinton. White supremacy demands it. Patriarchy demands it. Trump’s
supporters demand it.”
In this sense, every Trump lie is heard by his base as
vindication, experienced as a joyful celebration of a pocket picker
masquerading as someone finally standing up for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment